What I remember most about his week was definitely the NAPLAN testing. Which wasn’t really a part of galileo really, but it went with the theme for the week (ironically I guess)
So we started off the week with a video about the school system, things like the way we are tested and how all of our school work and testing leads up to getting a job and a spot in a good University. I agree that the way education is set up isn’t exactly ideal, but I highly doubt that there’s another way to do that would agree with people more than what we have now. I think that Galileo is a great way to get a break from normal school and learn some real life skills that will stay with me for a really long time, and I really do think that it’s making me more independent (I didn’t expect it to), whereas sometimes normal school sort of pushes you to rely on other people.
On the Monday of education week we went on our mini trail. Anna wasn’t there on that day so it was just me, Eva, and Sam. We had arranged to go to The Wheeler Centre, and had sent an email to someone working there on the Stella Prize, but they never actually returned any of our attempts to make an appointment. So we went there without really knowing what to expect, and I guess we got a little more than we had expected… We were basically given some booklets on The Wheeler Centre and told a little about what sorts of things they did there. We were then told that everything we needed for our literature project would be on their website, and ushered out the door. We weren’t entirely sure what to do with the 2 hours or so we had left, to we decided to go to the bookstore across the street. We spent around 45 minutes in there, looking at different books and reading, basically just browsing. It may sound boring, but bookstores have always been a place that I could easily spend hours in without getting the slightest bit bored.
The skills workshop on Tuesday morning was definitely the best yet. We learnt how to play chess (I already basically knew the rules, because of playing as a child) and then had to partner up and play. Anna and I basically failed our game, studying the board for 5 minutes at a time, trying to find a move that wouldn’t disturb any other pieces on the board (opposition’s pieces included). I found that I became accustomed to moving my queen or king one square to the left or right and then moving it back on my next turn just to get out of disturbing the serene state of the game, while Tracey and Rebi had already both won the game once and were starting their third game. Quite a few times John would come around to check on the games would come over and tell me that I was in check or that Anna’s bishop was right in line to take my queen, and we would realise that both the pieces had been in the same spots for at least 5 turns, and we hadn’t even realised.
The multiple intelligences class was also very interesting. I went into the class thinking I was good at thinking visually, musically and linguistically, and came out of the class having learnt I was very mathematical/logical,kinaesthetic (????), and linguistic. But I think that the tests were just a little too specific, like I’m just particularly skilled at hoola hooping and I’ve always been good at Sudoku. But when we did the online test I learnt I’m very musically, linguistically and mathematically intelligent. But then again I think that the test was mostly based on your own view of your skills, so if you ended with a score with lots of extremely high numbers, you’d obviously put mostly 5’s for questions like ‘You are good at solving maths problems’, which would probably be a lot more accurate with ACTUAL tests. But as we saw with the tests set by the Galileo teachers, it’s kind of hard to really tell where you are intelligent. These were my scores:

